Retaliation – One Degree of Separation

Suppose you and your spouse work for the same company and your spouse is one of those rebel rousing whistle blower types.   First, consider finding a new job or a new spouse.  But if you can’t do either, then you should carefully the track the outcome of Thompson v. North American Stainless.  

That case is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court and it involves a man who was fired shortly after his fiancee filed an EEOC charge against their common employer.   The Court will decide if the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII extend to third-parties.     Thanks to Ross Runkel at the Law Memo for reporting this development. 

Retaliation Law - Strong Support from High Court

The United States Supreme Court has made it clear that workers must be protected from retaliation. Illegal retaliation occurs whenever an employee is punished for reporting discrimination or sexual harassment. In a string of recent cases, the Court has strongly supported employees. The Court recognizes that retaliation cannot be tolerated. Otherwise, the anti-discrimination and harassment laws will have little effect if workers can be punished for reporting discrimination or harassment. Employees will not report workplace violations if they are not protected. In a recent decision, the Court stated that "fear of retaliation is the leading reason why people stay silent instead of voicing their concerns about bias and discrimination." In it's most recent decision, Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, the Court again held in favor of an employee who had been fired shortly after she told company investigators that her boss had sexually harassed her. For more on this case or to get a full version of the Court's decision, see The Employment Law Memo.

New York Retaliation Cases Get a Small Boost

Illegal retaliation in the workplace occurs when an employee engages in “protected activity” and then suffers retaliation by the employer. First, what does the term “protected activity” mean?   That term describes certain complaints made by an employee such as reporting sexual harassment, whistle blowing, or employment discrimination.  For example, if an employee tells her human resource department that her supervisor is sexual harassing her,  that is “protected activity.” Retaliation would occur if her company later fired or demoted her because of her sexual harassment complaint. 

As the Connecticut Employment Law Blog explains, timing is everything when it comes to proving retaliation.  To win a retaliation case, an employee must prove that the adverse employment action (termination, demotion, etc…) was the direct result of the “protected activity” (the sexual harassment complaint to HR…).   Often, the best and only evidence of “causation” is the fact that the employee was fired or targeted soon after making the complaint.  For example, causation could be established if the employee had a record of positive reviews and then became the target of bogus poor performance complaints soon after reporting her supervisor for sexual harassment.   That would be a classic retaliation case.  

It used to be that the adverse employment action (bad reviews, demotion, termination, etc…) had to be close in time to the protected activity – usually within a few months.  But a recent case in New York held that in some cases the timing need not be that close.  For a good explanation of that case see the Wait a Second! Blog.